TanToday - Helping Salon Owners, One At A Time, Since 2000! - View Single Post

Le · 2nd May 2008, 12:31 PM

ETS Tanning/633 combo… I do not believe in it at this point.

1.) Panel is too far from face to be at peak effectiveness. An LED’s power fades very fast.
2.) Cross contamination (do not know how else to put it) of other rays, specifically UVA

I remember Tony showing me a note from PTL that stated unequivocally that Lumiere customer should in no way tan their face and that any use of a device emitting UV would be counter productive.

So why the sudden change in opinion by PTL?
Is this Dr. Whitehurst opinion too, or just the marketing teams opinion?

Fact is that PTL does have the due credit in this field. They discovered it, they perfected it and now they get knocked off by others. ETS partnered up with the right company, but I would like to know about the 2 issues raised.

IMHO

2nd May 2008, 12:31 PM	#77 (permalink)
Le Hall of Famer Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Cloud 9 Posts: 1,388	Re: Tan America LED Light Therapy ETS Tanning/633 combo… I do not believe in it at this point. 1.) Panel is too far from face to be at peak effectiveness. An LED’s power fades very fast. 2.) Cross contamination (do not know how else to put it) of other rays, specifically UVA I remember Tony showing me a note from PTL that stated unequivocally that Lumiere customer should in no way tan their face and that any use of a device emitting UV would be counter productive. So why the sudden change in opinion by PTL? Is this Dr. Whitehurst opinion too, or just the marketing teams opinion? Fact is that PTL does have the due credit in this field. They discovered it, they perfected it and now they get knocked off by others. ETS partnered up with the right company, but I would like to know about the 2 issues raised. IMHO __________________ "We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit." - Aristotle "The first step to becoming is to will it." - Mother Teresa