[Roy Griffith, ETS]

Originally Posted by Le

ETS Tanning/633 combo… I do not believe in it at this point.

1.) Panel is too far from face to be at peak effectiveness. An LED’s power fades very fast.
2.) Cross contamination (do not know how else to put it) of other rays, specifically UVA

I remember Tony showing me a note from PTL that stated unequivocally that Lumiere customer should in no way tan their face and that any use of a device emitting UV would be counter productive.

So why the sudden change in opinion by PTL?
Is this Dr. Whitehurst opinion too, or just the marketing teams opinion?

Fact is that PTL does have the due credit in this field. They discovered it, they perfected it and now they get knocked off by others. ETS partnered up with the right company, but I would like to know about the 2 issues raised.

IMHO

I would like to address your concerns:

1. PTL measured their dose at the correct distance that a human face would be from the LED panel. This is the same dose that was utilized in clinical studies.

2. There is no cross contamination of UV rays as the HP facials cannot be activated at the same time as the LED panel.

3. The ETS Rejuvasun bed utilizes 633nm and 830nm LED's in alternating sessions as per the clinical study.