![]() |
Network Sites:
LOOKING FIT
National Tanning Training Institute
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|||||||
| Visit Our Sponsors! |
|
|
| News About Tanning Find out what the media is saying about the indoor tanning industry. Note: Please start a new thread in the private forum to discuss articles of a sensitive nature. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Hall of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,426
|
Inject-a-tan will challenge the sunbed
Roger Dobson HERE comes the sun . . . in drug form. Scientists have devised a new compound that could put an end to expensive trips to the tanning salon or risky sunbathing in the back garden. The drug creates an instant tan but at the same time protects against skin cancer. Yet there are still downsides: early tests required 30 separate injections and the pilot scheme has left some human guinea pigs feeling sick and faint. Once this feeling of nausea can be overcome, however, it could become a designer drug for those seeking the permanent tan of Robert Kilroy-Silk without the trouble of lying under sun lamps. When the scientists injected the drug into volunteers in Sydney, Australia, their skin became significantly darker and the sunburn risk was halved. A compound in the injection triggers the production of melanin, the brown pigment that gives the skin its colour and which acts as a sunscreen to protect the skin from ultraviolet light, the chief cause of skin cancer. In Britain more than 100,000 cases of skin cancer are reported each year. About 1,700 Britons die from skin cancer every year, with about 100 of those thought to be the result of sunbeds and tanning lamps. But there is still a massive market for bronzing treatments and last year £28m was spent on self-tanning. The body increases its production of melanin in response to exposure to the sun which is why people tan, but there needs to be significant exposure to the sun’s rays, or a tanning lamp, before this occurs. The theory behind the new compound, a hormone, is that it triggers the production of melanin without the need for the skin to be burnt first. The results of a trial involving 79 people being reported in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology this week show that the compound, injected into the abdomen in three 10-day cycles over three months, is highly effective. Melanin density in the skin increased significantly in all the men and women who had the injections. The average increase was 41%. At the end of the 90-day study there was a reduction of more than 50% in sunburn cell injury. “This study has shown for the first time the potential ability of a synthetic hormone that augments melanin production to provide photoprotection to people who normally burn in direct sunlight,” say the researchers in their report. “In the face of increased deterioration of the ozone layer, and the increasing incidence of skin cancer, the ability to stimulate the skin’s own ‘protective mechanism’ of tanning may prove extremely important as an additional photo-protective strategy.” The results of the trials show that injections were associated with four side effects: nausea, facial flushing, fatigue and vomiting. A dozen of those involved in the tests dropped out because of these side effects. The report says the downsides could be reduced by reformulating the drug as one that could be injected in a way that releases lower doses over a longer period of time. source |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Hall of Famer
|
Tanning is expensive? If it was, wouldnt we all have more money? Heck, I thought tanning was free if you buy a bottle of lotion?
![]() I thought they didnt think a tan protected you against burning, now they say it does. Like how they said that 100 of the 1700 people that die each year is "thought" to be the result of sun exposure. Interesting since they always say that tanning is the reason for skin cancer, rarely do they point to anything else. Interesting article. Still wouldnt want to stick myself to get a tan. Plus it doesnt say anything about Vit D. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
|
Will they put this in the drug store in pill form or will everyone have to pay for a doctor visit and lord knows how much for the injections? They want us all on some type of drug. Don`t they call this "drug addicts". So how is this drug being tested over a long period of time? How do they know what the outcome will be for those taking it? Side effects over the years could be a lot worse than tanning. Oh but I thought nothing was that bad??
So let me get this straight. Taking this drug will be better for you than getting in the tanning bed. Says who? A drug is a drug and until long years of testing after taking it no one will be sure. How many will take the chance? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Hall of Famer
|
[QUOTE][Yet there are still downsides: early tests required 30 separate injections and the pilot scheme has left some human guinea pigs feeling sick and faint.
/QUOTE] hmmm, or you can go 3-5 times on an HP and feel great. More and more people I meet lately are looking for drug free alternatives to feeling better. they are looking towards healing foods, going organic and natural path doctors. IF injecting this drug makes you feel sick all the time, it won't get far off the ground. So they say they will lower the dose to reduse the sick feeling so that meen even more injections. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Editor-in-chief,
Are you a tanning salon owner or do you just surf the net in search of anti tanning propaganda? I, for one, am not interested in hearing yet another reason to not tan. What do you think the collective negative energy from everyone reading your posts will create? And what if we were all thinking about how great our industry is? What a good time it is to be a tanning salon owner and how much opportunity for growth there is. How people are becoming more aware of the chemicals they put on their bodies (sunscreen) and are interested in vitamin D and the healing power of the sun. I would like to direct my thoughts and energy into the things I want, not the things I do not want. Try it!! |
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Hall of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,426
|
Thanks, christine, I'll file that under "Shoot The Messenger."
I suggest that you stick to reading the tanning trade magazines, where everything is wonderful. The distributors and manufacturers are also more than happy to blow smoke up your butt. I don't make up the news. I just republish the items that I think might be of interest to the membership. Reading is optional. Most of the news effecting the indoor tanning industry is negative. Deal. Sometimes, I don't like reality either. However, life goes on without my permission. Last edited by Editor-in-Chief; 24th July 2006 at 06:18 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Hall of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,123
|
To even give this any attention is pathetic. It's posted once a year like it's the beginning of something wonderful.
Tanning in a syringe. Yeah and I invented sanitary TNT wipes. Wipe it on your ass after a #2 and it blasts it clean. So much faster and good for the environment. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Super Star
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 738
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Hall of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,493
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|