Home
Homepage Forums Advertise with Us Gallery Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   TanToday - Tanning Salon Business Forum > Education and Training > Science of UV

Visit Our Sponsors!

Science of UV Discuss the ins and outs of UV light, including the benefits (vitamin D!).

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2nd December 2004, 10:15 AM   #1 (permalink)
Super Star
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 564
Default UV before 18

I see Don has an informative article about the myth that has been spread by dermotologists about people getting 80% of their sun exposure by the age of 18. Here is another study in the upcoming December issue of the JID that further supports the debunking of that myth.

Journal of Investigative Dermatology 123, 1147-1150 (2004)

Proportion of Lifetime UV Dose Received by Children, Teenagers and Adults Based on Time-Stamped Personal Dosimetry

Elisabeth Thieden, Peter A. Philipsen, Jane Sandby-Møller, Jakob Heydenreich and Hans Christian Wulf


Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark Ultraviolet (UV) reduction campaigns since 1986 were based on the estimation that individuals get 80% of their cumulative lifetime UV dose by the age of 18. To investigate if this estimation is true, we compared annual UV doses received during life in 164 Danish volunteers: children, teenagers, indoor workers, and golfers (age range 4–67 y) who recorded sun exposure behavior in diaries and carried personal UV dosimeters, measuring time-stamped UV doses. The annual UV dose did not significantly correlate with age but the variation in annual UV dose was high (median 166 SED (standard erythema dose), 95% range: 37–551 SED). The annual UV dose did correlate with days with risk behavior (sunbathing/exposing upper body) (r=0.51, p<0.001) and in adults also with hours performing outdoor sports (r=0.39, p<0.001), gardening, and sun-bed sessions (r=0.26, p=0.02). Teenagers had significantly more days with risk behavior than adults (21 vs 13 d, p=0.006) but not than children (15 d). No differences in UV dose among the age groups were found on workdays. Only 25% of the lifetime UV dose was received before the age of 20 and the annual UV dose was thus independent of age. Reduction of cumulative lifetime UV dose could be obtained by minimizing risk behavior.
-------------

note:
I see annual UV and sunbed use has the lowest correlation (r=0.39, r^2=0.15) of all categories. I wonder where that could lead.
stan@sunsys is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:07 AM.
 



Copyright © 2009 by Virgo Publishing LLC, all rights reserved.
P.O. Box 40079, Phoenix, AZ 85067-0079
Phone: 480-990-1101 - Email: admin@tantoday.com
Privacy statement Terms of use